Riverside Cleaning

Performance collection agency based in Oregon is attempting to collect on an account for Riverside Cleaning which is the business name that Amy Lyngstad is using for her “cleaning” service. They state her phone number is (605)760-7164 and lives in Utica South Dakota. A new twist for her to “steal” money? She does not pay her bills and has bad credit so now she uses a business name to scam credit card companies it would seem. Do not credit card companies watch for scammers and easily get credit while honest people have a hard  time? You pickup the bill since companies pass on her gains and their loses to you.

Thank law enforcement and activist Judges for allowing to pick your wallet.

Amy Lyngstad’s phone number: 605-661-6422 for all you bill collection agencies.

Advertisements

Finding of Facts and Conclusions of Law

Finding of facts and conclusion of law finding that Amy Lyngstad is a perjurer, although the Judge does not use that exact phrase. Lyngstad tried to get her daughters to commit perjury. Deputy Sheriff states he can predict the future and the Judge did not believe him. Lyngstad gave lots of perjured testimony and why not she is above the law. Michaela testifies she is scared of her dad but does not know why looking to her mother to see if she said it right. Judge saw it and states it in the findings. Suborning perjury is law but again laws are not enforced in Lyngstad’s case.  Amy Lyngtad’s perjured affidavit link.page 2, page 3. Click on to enlarge.

That Linda Kogel, attorney also perjured herself is not brought up. Lyngstad testified Michaela’s dad is at her work harassing her while Michaela testified he is not. Amy Lyngstad is a bold faced liar, child abusing felon who is above the law thanks to crooked Judges,child protection and law enforcement.   Pages have been corrected to read correctly.

tTPO first page TPO Second page TPO 3rd page 4th page 5th page 6th page 7th page 8th page 9th page 10th page 11 th page 12 page 13th page 14th page 15th 16th 17th page 18th page 19th page 20

Blogger wins! Site protected by First Amendment.

Amy Lyngstad got a Temporary Protection Order  (TPO 12-585) against her ex husband. She testified that he is coming to her house at night. Problem for her was he was working and the Court found her testimony unreliable, legal speak for she is a liar. Lyngstad also put her daughter on the stand and had the daughter perjure herself. The Judge again found the testimony unreliable. The older daughter also testified and her testimony was deemed unreliable. Amy Lyngstad also testified that her ex goes to the daughter’s work and harasses her while her daughter testified he did not. Perjury seems to be Amy Lyngstad’s middle name and why not she knows she will not be prosecuted. The transcript too will be posted.

The best part was that Lyngstad wanted the Court to take the website down. After a thorough findings of facts and conclusions of law this website under the First Amendment of the United States is protected speech.
The findings of facts and conclusion of law will be posted when available. Amy Lyngstad  now commits libel and slander against her  ex husband saying he is stalking her with this website after the ruling. Under law the Judge has no jurisdiction on the matter of her attorney, Linda Kogel, filing perjured documents.



Bottom of page Lyngstad wants this site taken down.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Employer testified that her ex was at work, not in Utica. Her daughter testified her father did not come into her work and harass her as Amy Lyngstad testified too.

 

This site is NOT stalking Amy Lyngstad but the site is showing with a few exceptions that the Courts, Prosecutors and law enforcement don’t follow the law when it comes to Amy Lyngstad. Why is it Amy Lyngstad is not arrested for identity theft and child abuse when the evidence is quite clear she committed both child abuse and identity theft. Or her Attorney Linda Kogel along with her client and 2 daughters also committed perjury?  Amy Lyngstad lied her ass off in Court.Even by a preponderance of the evidence she did not get a protection order, not the reasonable doubt standard. Amy Lyngstad does not want the public to know she is a child abuser, identity thief who social services, law enforcement, and prosecutors cover for. Where is the Amy Lyngstad exclusion?

22-29-1. Perjury–Violation. Any person who, having taken an oath to testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any state or federal proceeding or action in which such an oath may by law be administered, states, intentionally and contrary to the oath, any material matter which the person knows to be false, is guilty of perjury.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-1; SL 2002, ch 113, § 1; SL 2005, ch 120, § 30.

22-29-3. Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.

22-29-6. Subornation of perjury–Violation–Punishment. Any person who intentionally procures another person to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury. Subornation of perjury is punishable in the same manner as perjury, and as if the suborner were personally guilty of the perjury procured.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-3; SL 2005, ch 120, § 35.

Prosecutors lying

Why do both State and Federal prosecutors lie about the law? Amy Lyngstad can be prosecuted for the id  theft after 2005

Prosecutor and Judge ignored the laws as written and now a 5th DUI, 1st degree attempted murder and a state trooper with head injuries just  Judges and prosecutor IGNORED THE LAW! KELO      ARGUSLEADER

22-29-3.   Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.
Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.

22-29-18.   Sufficiency of evidence for conviction. It is sufficient for a conviction of any offense under this chapter that a finding of guilt is based upon admissible evidence. No minimum number of witnesses is required. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence of a conviction under this chapter, the court shall only consider whether there is evidence in the record which, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Source: SL 1984, ch 169; SL 2005, ch 120, § 48.

Rep. Noem aide

Telephone call to Representative Kristi Noem’s aide. Again if someone breaks federal law and you are the victim hire a lawyer to get a prosecution. Bad Judge? Hire an attorney. He too is speechless on the fact Amy Lyngstad does not have to obey laws.

Phone call.

Why is Amy Lyngstad above the law? Why can Linda Kogel and Judge Jim Anderson commit perjury with out consequences?

Linda Kogel, Attorney at Law, Perjurer

Linda Kogel in her Motion, second paragraph states ” Defendant has at all times refused to engage in or successfully complete a parenting class.” Filed September of 2000 a completion of parenting classes taken  a year earlier certificate. Kogel keeps telling the Court the Defendant never took parenting classes. How many lies can an attorney tell the Court?  South Dakota Courts Plenty. Her email below makes it about him not her lying to the court for years. She also states that the daugther’s social security numbers are posted but she can not produce the webpage. They never were posted but can lie all she wants.

Linda Kogel signed it and testified that it was true. She will make excuses and forget the law. What about the social security numbers she says are posted which never were? Gilbertson does know, return receipt shown below.Even if Kogel was arrested for perjury the Judge would dismiss it. All the felonies Lyngstad did and no prosecution proves the courts are corrupt. Prosecution or Judge or both corrupt?

She forgot about the certificate filed years ago, not an excuse under law for committing perjury.  SDCL for perjury

 Congress.org

Phone call to Senator John Thune’s office

Telephone call to Senator Thune’s office. Why are federal laws passed that no one enforces?  Evidently Senator Thune does not care about South Dakotans or just certain South Dakotans? Other Congressman ask for investigation into South Dakota though.

LINK to Thune’s Staffer phone call.   Opens in new window and just click play at center of the screen.

Congressman call for investigation into South Dakota Social Services. LINK

She talks of separation of State and Federal jurisdiction over the Judiciary. The two (STATE) judges, Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. and Michael T. Conahan, pleaded guilty in Federal District Court in Scranton, Pa. Link  2 State Judges were violating children’s rights.

We send troops over seas to stop this kind of thing but Senator Thune can NOT help South Dakotans.  The Sioux Falls office most likely does not want to upset the apple cart with all the corruption going on here. Better to keep the public in the dark how things really work.

Forwarded from Congress.org  LINK