On Amy Lyngstad’s hidden Facebook account is a picture of her and her convicted pedophile. Also on the page are pictures of people’s children.
Amy Lyngstad testified she does not have a picture of her and her b/f on her face book account.
On the news there are stories of pedophiles using their girlfriends account to get on Facebook to view and contact children. Or pedophiles force their girlfriend to the girlfriends account to use the internet as the girlfriend has no where else to go. convicted sex offenders are not supposed to be on Facebook but laws hardly apply to Amy Lyngstad. She knows law enforcement and Judges will not bother her with such things as her committing felonies and other crimes. Child protection services is not a children’s protection agency. Amy Lyngstad has arrests and convictions for domestic violence which under law makes for a rebuttal that she should have custody of children. But as shown laws are not relevant in a South Dakota Court if Amy Lyngtad is involved due to the animosity of law enforcement and judges against her ex. All entirely plausible. Linda Kogel committed perjury along with Judge Anderson and nothing is done about it as shown on this site.
Under the “fair use” rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Don’t you think the public has a right to know about a possible danger to children, covered up by the Courts and law enforcement?