Ignore the law SD law enforcement *read comment*

SD Attorney General tells law enforcement in SD to ignore the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving DUI arrests. U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is required in order to draw blood. SD AG says to ignore the ruling. LINK to keloland. But  Sioux Falls SD requires law enforcement to get a warrant. Link

What kind of Attorney General tells law enforcement to ignore U.S. Supreme Court rulings? A corrupt one who ignores the law at his whim.

You can see why Amy Lyngstad can use her daughter’s identity and use fake social security numbers when Jackley can ignore the law blatantly.

Read comment, Yankton is CORRUPT!

Found on Topix, Yankton:

A person posted a comment about her trip to South Dakota, Her experiences in Yankton she has posted. She has never been to a more corrupt town than Yankton South Dakota. She is right people in South Dakota are in denial that the police and judges in South Dakota are CORRUPT.
southdakotagov she posted her comment and her contact information. Thune and Noem stick their heads in the sand and don’t want to get involved in local corruption. More interested in lining their own pockets.
Ask Amy Lyngstad how to keep from being prosecuted or arrested in South Dakota. Sexual acts?>><<<

Advertisements

Finding of Facts and Conclusions of Law

Finding of facts and conclusion of law finding that Amy Lyngstad is a perjurer, although the Judge does not use that exact phrase. Lyngstad tried to get her daughters to commit perjury. Deputy Sheriff states he can predict the future and the Judge did not believe him. Lyngstad gave lots of perjured testimony and why not she is above the law. Michaela testifies she is scared of her dad but does not know why looking to her mother to see if she said it right. Judge saw it and states it in the findings. Suborning perjury is law but again laws are not enforced in Lyngstad’s case.  Amy Lyngtad’s perjured affidavit link.page 2, page 3. Click on to enlarge.

That Linda Kogel, attorney also perjured herself is not brought up. Lyngstad testified Michaela’s dad is at her work harassing her while Michaela testified he is not. Amy Lyngstad is a bold faced liar, child abusing felon who is above the law thanks to crooked Judges,child protection and law enforcement.   Pages have been corrected to read correctly.

tTPO first page TPO Second page TPO 3rd page 4th page 5th page 6th page 7th page 8th page 9th page 10th page 11 th page 12 page 13th page 14th page 15th 16th 17th page 18th page 19th page 20

U.S. Attorney General’s office

Phone call to U.S. Attorney General’s office. Applying online with someone’s else’s name, a fake social security number for a credit card and then maxing out and not repaying the credit card company in not an egregious crime? Or getting utilities in your kid’s name and not paying the bill?

LINK    Keloland story on protecting your child’s identity.

Dennis Holmes, Federal Prosecutor, from Pierre S.D., sounds pissed and does not want to be bothered. She broke federal laws and the U.S Attorney General’s office does not want to be bothered with it as it is not egregious enough(???).  Why do we have laws if they don’t apply to all people? She used her daughter’s identity  for years and it is not egregious enough? Similar crime, but HE was prosecuted by Sioux Falls office. Wagner was told that Amy Lyngstad would not go to prison because the system did not like him. Laws are not relevant just what the system wants covered up.

A Yankton businessman thinks it is a serious crime and there should be prosecuted for fraud.  “Someone should be going to prison for intentionally committing fraud.”  Jokes on him.

Can you say COVERUP!!!!!?   We don’t like you so we will ignore the rule of laws and cover up bad Judges in South Dakota.

Email to the DOJ: 

Email to Congress.

I spoke with Dennis Holmes of the Sioux Falls U.S Attorney General’s office. My ex-wife using our daughter’s identity after her conviction is not egregious enough for them to prosecute. Amy Lyngstad used a fake social security number to get a credit card using the kid’s identity. It is not serious enough? Google southdakotagov and listen to the phone call between him and I.

Sounds like does not want to be bothered about such trivial matters and identity theft.He does not like me and does not want to be bothered about federal crimes. He makes the law and exceptions?

Don’t call me, email me and it appears I will have to visit your offices. Just what the hell are they covering up that they will not prosecute a series of federal crimes?

The U.S. Attorney Generals office does not enforce the law as written. Or are they covering something up or embarrassed she can do so many federal crimes and not get caught?

Office of Professional Responsibility

Will they do their job and find out why their was no federal prosecution for a federal crime and why the State Judges ignore federal law with the Sioux Falls Bureau condoning it?