Who protects the child?

The youngest daughter got pregnant at 18 and now has a daughter of her own. High school drop out and pregnant at 18 thanks to a corrupt court system that kept the father out. Lyngstad and her parents brain washed her that her dad wanted nothing to do with her along with “health professionals” professionals such as Heartland. The daughter lied to the court as shown by court documents , Lyngstad was coaching her on the stand. (see last attempt at protection order).

She said her dad could see her and the baby if this site was taken down. When it was hidden she no longer wanted to talk to her dad. Manipulative like her mother.

The daughter will lie to you to get her way then go back on her word. Following in her mother’s footsteps, since that is the life she knows.

The new mother said that Dale Kotalik is a real nice person. Famous last words about child molesters after they molested children. He was a real nice person, we did not think he was molesting children, he was such a nice man. In 1995 when he convicted Lyngstad thought that was horrible him molesting children, now she lives with him. The grandfather can not see the child but a registered sex offender can. Or how long before her mother moves in, with tax payers footing the bills?

Picture of him. Kotalik

YOUR SILENCE WILL NOT HELP THE NEXT VICTIM. Tell a Friend.

Amy Lyngstad
Phone Number: 6056652216 old phone number for you bill collectors.
Utica,SD 57078

The youngest did not remember this at all, the Court never allowed the father to see the report about the child abuse. The news is full of stories how bad the system is Social Services covering up child abuse. Remember they never allowed anyone to see the report.

court order

Amy Lyngstad bored comment.

lyngstad

 

followurheart1999@yahoo.com

174.32.104.157 Direct TV Utica South Dakota address a.k.a. Amy Lyngstad Utica SD

Submitted on 2015/03/03 at 3:20 pm

Ur kids hate u and never want u in there lives! Why continue to obsess about ur x wife, pretty sure she has moved on…why r u not remarried with another family? Cant fine a woman to put up with the way u attack ur x wife? I actually feel sorry for someone like u. God be with u.

Amy Lyngstad with the help of a corrupt judicial system did everything to destroy the father /daughter relationship. Amy Lyngstad committed dozens of State and Federal crimes yet was only prosecuted once for identity theft even used her own daughter’s identity to commit identity theft while Lyngstad was on probation.

Cant fine a woman? Drunk or high again?  Pretty sure she has moved on? Lyngstad  is unemployable at a regular job with her disorders.  Cleaning service is making your ass big. You got a chauffeur license and insurance driving elderly ladies to stores?

“why r u not remarried with another family?” How do you know he is not and does not have other kids? Stalking him are you? Lyngstad seems to know everything about her ex-husband.

God be with you? You need  help though you know how to manipulate those that could help you.

Lyngstad destroyed the relation ship between the daughters and father so she could get away with her many many crimes. 3 arrests for assault, 2 convictions. Felony convictions for passing no account checks and identity theft and DUI’s.

Anthony at EMS would like to speak with you though you will not answer his calls.  Call him or he says he is getting a court order. 605-301-4876

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), released by the AmericanPsychiatric Association in 2013, lists both sociopathy and psychopathy under the heading of Antisocial Personality Disorders (ASPD).

  • A disregard for laws and social mores
  • A disregard for the rights of others
  • A failure to feel remorse or guilt
  • A tendency to display violent behavior

In addition to their commonalities, sociopaths and psychopaths also have their own unique behavioral characteristics, as well.

Gone Girl

Ignore the law SD law enforcement *read comment*

SD Attorney General tells law enforcement in SD to ignore the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving DUI arrests. U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is required in order to draw blood. SD AG says to ignore the ruling. LINK to keloland. But  Sioux Falls SD requires law enforcement to get a warrant. Link

What kind of Attorney General tells law enforcement to ignore U.S. Supreme Court rulings? A corrupt one who ignores the law at his whim.

You can see why Amy Lyngstad can use her daughter’s identity and use fake social security numbers when Jackley can ignore the law blatantly.

Read comment, Yankton is CORRUPT!

Found on Topix, Yankton:

A person posted a comment about her trip to South Dakota, Her experiences in Yankton she has posted. She has never been to a more corrupt town than Yankton South Dakota. She is right people in South Dakota are in denial that the police and judges in South Dakota are CORRUPT.
southdakotagov she posted her comment and her contact information. Thune and Noem stick their heads in the sand and don’t want to get involved in local corruption. More interested in lining their own pockets.
Ask Amy Lyngstad how to keep from being prosecuted or arrested in South Dakota. Sexual acts?>><<<

Blogger wins! Site protected by First Amendment.

Amy Lyngstad got a Temporary Protection Order  (TPO 12-585) against her ex husband. She testified that he is coming to her house at night. Problem for her was he was working and the Court found her testimony unreliable, legal speak for she is a liar. Lyngstad also put her daughter on the stand and had the daughter perjure herself. The Judge again found the testimony unreliable. The older daughter also testified and her testimony was deemed unreliable. Amy Lyngstad also testified that her ex goes to the daughter’s work and harasses her while her daughter testified he did not. Perjury seems to be Amy Lyngstad’s middle name and why not she knows she will not be prosecuted. The transcript too will be posted.

The best part was that Lyngstad wanted the Court to take the website down. After a thorough findings of facts and conclusions of law this website under the First Amendment of the United States is protected speech.
The findings of facts and conclusion of law will be posted when available. Amy Lyngstad  now commits libel and slander against her  ex husband saying he is stalking her with this website after the ruling. Under law the Judge has no jurisdiction on the matter of her attorney, Linda Kogel, filing perjured documents.



Bottom of page Lyngstad wants this site taken down.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Employer testified that her ex was at work, not in Utica. Her daughter testified her father did not come into her work and harass her as Amy Lyngstad testified too.

 

This site is NOT stalking Amy Lyngstad but the site is showing with a few exceptions that the Courts, Prosecutors and law enforcement don’t follow the law when it comes to Amy Lyngstad. Why is it Amy Lyngstad is not arrested for identity theft and child abuse when the evidence is quite clear she committed both child abuse and identity theft. Or her Attorney Linda Kogel along with her client and 2 daughters also committed perjury?  Amy Lyngstad lied her ass off in Court.Even by a preponderance of the evidence she did not get a protection order, not the reasonable doubt standard. Amy Lyngstad does not want the public to know she is a child abuser, identity thief who social services, law enforcement, and prosecutors cover for. Where is the Amy Lyngstad exclusion?

22-29-1. Perjury–Violation. Any person who, having taken an oath to testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any state or federal proceeding or action in which such an oath may by law be administered, states, intentionally and contrary to the oath, any material matter which the person knows to be false, is guilty of perjury.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-1; SL 2002, ch 113, § 1; SL 2005, ch 120, § 30.

22-29-3. Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.

22-29-6. Subornation of perjury–Violation–Punishment. Any person who intentionally procures another person to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury. Subornation of perjury is punishable in the same manner as perjury, and as if the suborner were personally guilty of the perjury procured.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-3; SL 2005, ch 120, § 35.

U.S. Attorney General’s office

Phone call to U.S. Attorney General’s office. Applying online with someone’s else’s name, a fake social security number for a credit card and then maxing out and not repaying the credit card company in not an egregious crime? Or getting utilities in your kid’s name and not paying the bill?

LINK    Keloland story on protecting your child’s identity.

Dennis Holmes, Federal Prosecutor, from Pierre S.D., sounds pissed and does not want to be bothered. She broke federal laws and the U.S Attorney General’s office does not want to be bothered with it as it is not egregious enough(???).  Why do we have laws if they don’t apply to all people? She used her daughter’s identity  for years and it is not egregious enough? Similar crime, but HE was prosecuted by Sioux Falls office. Wagner was told that Amy Lyngstad would not go to prison because the system did not like him. Laws are not relevant just what the system wants covered up.

A Yankton businessman thinks it is a serious crime and there should be prosecuted for fraud.  “Someone should be going to prison for intentionally committing fraud.”  Jokes on him.

Can you say COVERUP!!!!!?   We don’t like you so we will ignore the rule of laws and cover up bad Judges in South Dakota.

Email to the DOJ: 

Email to Congress.

I spoke with Dennis Holmes of the Sioux Falls U.S Attorney General’s office. My ex-wife using our daughter’s identity after her conviction is not egregious enough for them to prosecute. Amy Lyngstad used a fake social security number to get a credit card using the kid’s identity. It is not serious enough? Google southdakotagov and listen to the phone call between him and I.

Sounds like does not want to be bothered about such trivial matters and identity theft.He does not like me and does not want to be bothered about federal crimes. He makes the law and exceptions?

Don’t call me, email me and it appears I will have to visit your offices. Just what the hell are they covering up that they will not prosecute a series of federal crimes?

The U.S. Attorney Generals office does not enforce the law as written. Or are they covering something up or embarrassed she can do so many federal crimes and not get caught?

Mnvikesqueen

On Amy Lyngstad’s hidden Facebook account is a picture of her and her convicted pedophile. Also on the page are pictures of people’s children.

Amy Lyngstad testified she does not have a picture of her and her b/f on her face book account.

On the news there are stories of pedophiles using their girlfriends account to get on Facebook to  view and contact children.  Or pedophiles force their girlfriend to the girlfriends account to use the internet as the girlfriend has no where else to go. convicted sex offenders are not supposed to be on Facebook but laws hardly apply to Amy Lyngstad. She knows law enforcement and Judges will not bother her with such things as her committing felonies and other crimes. Child protection services is not a children’s protection agency. Amy Lyngstad has arrests and convictions for domestic violence which under law makes for a rebuttal that she should have custody of children. But as shown laws are not relevant in a South Dakota Court if Amy Lyngtad is involved due to the animosity of law enforcement and judges against her ex. All entirely plausible. Linda Kogel committed perjury along with Judge Anderson and nothing is done about it as shown on this site.

Under the “fair use” rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.

Don’t you think the public has a right to know about a possible danger to children, covered up by the Courts and law enforcement?

Rep. Kristie Noem’s Letter, Huh?

Reply from Kristie Noem’s office. Why is Amy Lyngstad not prosecuted by Assistant A.G. Brandon Johnson for identity theft after the investigation by Jim Morningwood. Mr. Morning wood turned in the evidence of identity theft and mis-use of social security numbers to Mr. Johnson’s office. Why is it not on the news like everyone else’s if Lyngstad was arrested for committing federal felonies? In addition why is not Linda Kogel and Judge Jim Anderson prosecuted by the State for perjury when the duo so blatantly commits perjury? Why no answer from Senator Johnson and John Thune? The old boys network protecting their pocketbooks or they are not up for re-election so they don’t have any interest in South Dakota corruption and crimes? Lyngstad has a good income from committing federal crimes but the IRS is not interested why?