Ignore the law SD law enforcement *read comment*

SD Attorney General tells law enforcement in SD to ignore the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving DUI arrests. U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is required in order to draw blood. SD AG says to ignore the ruling. LINK to keloland. But  Sioux Falls SD requires law enforcement to get a warrant. Link

What kind of Attorney General tells law enforcement to ignore U.S. Supreme Court rulings? A corrupt one who ignores the law at his whim.

You can see why Amy Lyngstad can use her daughter’s identity and use fake social security numbers when Jackley can ignore the law blatantly.

Read comment, Yankton is CORRUPT!

Found on Topix, Yankton:

A person posted a comment about her trip to South Dakota, Her experiences in Yankton she has posted. She has never been to a more corrupt town than Yankton South Dakota. She is right people in South Dakota are in denial that the police and judges in South Dakota are CORRUPT.
southdakotagov she posted her comment and her contact information. Thune and Noem stick their heads in the sand and don’t want to get involved in local corruption. More interested in lining their own pockets.
Ask Amy Lyngstad how to keep from being prosecuted or arrested in South Dakota. Sexual acts?>><<<

Advertisements

Finding of Facts and Conclusions of Law

Finding of facts and conclusion of law finding that Amy Lyngstad is a perjurer, although the Judge does not use that exact phrase. Lyngstad tried to get her daughters to commit perjury. Deputy Sheriff states he can predict the future and the Judge did not believe him. Lyngstad gave lots of perjured testimony and why not she is above the law. Michaela testifies she is scared of her dad but does not know why looking to her mother to see if she said it right. Judge saw it and states it in the findings. Suborning perjury is law but again laws are not enforced in Lyngstad’s case.  Amy Lyngtad’s perjured affidavit link.page 2, page 3. Click on to enlarge.

That Linda Kogel, attorney also perjured herself is not brought up. Lyngstad testified Michaela’s dad is at her work harassing her while Michaela testified he is not. Amy Lyngstad is a bold faced liar, child abusing felon who is above the law thanks to crooked Judges,child protection and law enforcement.   Pages have been corrected to read correctly.

tTPO first page TPO Second page TPO 3rd page 4th page 5th page 6th page 7th page 8th page 9th page 10th page 11 th page 12 page 13th page 14th page 15th 16th 17th page 18th page 19th page 20

Blogger wins! Site protected by First Amendment.

Amy Lyngstad got a Temporary Protection Order  (TPO 12-585) against her ex husband. She testified that he is coming to her house at night. Problem for her was he was working and the Court found her testimony unreliable, legal speak for she is a liar. Lyngstad also put her daughter on the stand and had the daughter perjure herself. The Judge again found the testimony unreliable. The older daughter also testified and her testimony was deemed unreliable. Amy Lyngstad also testified that her ex goes to the daughter’s work and harasses her while her daughter testified he did not. Perjury seems to be Amy Lyngstad’s middle name and why not she knows she will not be prosecuted. The transcript too will be posted.

The best part was that Lyngstad wanted the Court to take the website down. After a thorough findings of facts and conclusions of law this website under the First Amendment of the United States is protected speech.
The findings of facts and conclusion of law will be posted when available. Amy Lyngstad  now commits libel and slander against her  ex husband saying he is stalking her with this website after the ruling. Under law the Judge has no jurisdiction on the matter of her attorney, Linda Kogel, filing perjured documents.



Bottom of page Lyngstad wants this site taken down.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Employer testified that her ex was at work, not in Utica. Her daughter testified her father did not come into her work and harass her as Amy Lyngstad testified too.

 

This site is NOT stalking Amy Lyngstad but the site is showing with a few exceptions that the Courts, Prosecutors and law enforcement don’t follow the law when it comes to Amy Lyngstad. Why is it Amy Lyngstad is not arrested for identity theft and child abuse when the evidence is quite clear she committed both child abuse and identity theft. Or her Attorney Linda Kogel along with her client and 2 daughters also committed perjury?  Amy Lyngstad lied her ass off in Court.Even by a preponderance of the evidence she did not get a protection order, not the reasonable doubt standard. Amy Lyngstad does not want the public to know she is a child abuser, identity thief who social services, law enforcement, and prosecutors cover for. Where is the Amy Lyngstad exclusion?

22-29-1. Perjury–Violation. Any person who, having taken an oath to testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any state or federal proceeding or action in which such an oath may by law be administered, states, intentionally and contrary to the oath, any material matter which the person knows to be false, is guilty of perjury.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-1; SL 2002, ch 113, § 1; SL 2005, ch 120, § 30.

22-29-3. Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.

22-29-6. Subornation of perjury–Violation–Punishment. Any person who intentionally procures another person to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury. Subornation of perjury is punishable in the same manner as perjury, and as if the suborner were personally guilty of the perjury procured.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-3; SL 2005, ch 120, § 35.

Prosecutors lying

Why do both State and Federal prosecutors lie about the law? Amy Lyngstad can be prosecuted for the id  theft after 2005

Prosecutor and Judge ignored the laws as written and now a 5th DUI, 1st degree attempted murder and a state trooper with head injuries just  Judges and prosecutor IGNORED THE LAW! KELO      ARGUSLEADER

22-29-3.   Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.
Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.

22-29-18.   Sufficiency of evidence for conviction. It is sufficient for a conviction of any offense under this chapter that a finding of guilt is based upon admissible evidence. No minimum number of witnesses is required. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence of a conviction under this chapter, the court shall only consider whether there is evidence in the record which, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Source: SL 1984, ch 169; SL 2005, ch 120, § 48.

U.S. Attorney General’s office

Phone call to U.S. Attorney General’s office. Applying online with someone’s else’s name, a fake social security number for a credit card and then maxing out and not repaying the credit card company in not an egregious crime? Or getting utilities in your kid’s name and not paying the bill?

LINK    Keloland story on protecting your child’s identity.

Dennis Holmes, Federal Prosecutor, from Pierre S.D., sounds pissed and does not want to be bothered. She broke federal laws and the U.S Attorney General’s office does not want to be bothered with it as it is not egregious enough(???).  Why do we have laws if they don’t apply to all people? She used her daughter’s identity  for years and it is not egregious enough? Similar crime, but HE was prosecuted by Sioux Falls office. Wagner was told that Amy Lyngstad would not go to prison because the system did not like him. Laws are not relevant just what the system wants covered up.

A Yankton businessman thinks it is a serious crime and there should be prosecuted for fraud.  “Someone should be going to prison for intentionally committing fraud.”  Jokes on him.

Can you say COVERUP!!!!!?   We don’t like you so we will ignore the rule of laws and cover up bad Judges in South Dakota.

Email to the DOJ: 

Email to Congress.

I spoke with Dennis Holmes of the Sioux Falls U.S Attorney General’s office. My ex-wife using our daughter’s identity after her conviction is not egregious enough for them to prosecute. Amy Lyngstad used a fake social security number to get a credit card using the kid’s identity. It is not serious enough? Google southdakotagov and listen to the phone call between him and I.

Sounds like does not want to be bothered about such trivial matters and identity theft.He does not like me and does not want to be bothered about federal crimes. He makes the law and exceptions?

Don’t call me, email me and it appears I will have to visit your offices. Just what the hell are they covering up that they will not prosecute a series of federal crimes?

The U.S. Attorney Generals office does not enforce the law as written. Or are they covering something up or embarrassed she can do so many federal crimes and not get caught?

Rep. Kristie Noem’s Letter, Huh?

Reply from Kristie Noem’s office. Why is Amy Lyngstad not prosecuted by Assistant A.G. Brandon Johnson for identity theft after the investigation by Jim Morningwood. Mr. Morning wood turned in the evidence of identity theft and mis-use of social security numbers to Mr. Johnson’s office. Why is it not on the news like everyone else’s if Lyngstad was arrested for committing federal felonies? In addition why is not Linda Kogel and Judge Jim Anderson prosecuted by the State for perjury when the duo so blatantly commits perjury? Why no answer from Senator Johnson and John Thune? The old boys network protecting their pocketbooks or they are not up for re-election so they don’t have any interest in South Dakota corruption and crimes? Lyngstad has a good income from committing federal crimes but the IRS is not interested why?

Rep. Noem aide

Telephone call to Representative Kristi Noem’s aide. Again if someone breaks federal law and you are the victim hire a lawyer to get a prosecution. Bad Judge? Hire an attorney. He too is speechless on the fact Amy Lyngstad does not have to obey laws.

Phone call.

Why is Amy Lyngstad above the law? Why can Linda Kogel and Judge Jim Anderson commit perjury with out consequences?