Quite the picture of her out partying, looking quite dumb in my opinion.
Why do both State and Federal prosecutors lie about the law? Amy Lyngstad can be prosecuted for the id theft after 2005
22-29-3. Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.
Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.
22-29-18. Sufficiency of evidence for conviction. It is sufficient for a conviction of any offense under this chapter that a finding of guilt is based upon admissible evidence. No minimum number of witnesses is required. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence of a conviction under this chapter, the court shall only consider whether there is evidence in the record which, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Source: SL 1984, ch 169; SL 2005, ch 120, § 48.
Phone call to U.S. Attorney General’s office. Applying online with someone’s else’s name, a fake social security number for a credit card and then maxing out and not repaying the credit card company in not an egregious crime? Or getting utilities in your kid’s name and not paying the bill?
Dennis Holmes, Federal Prosecutor, from Pierre S.D., sounds pissed and does not want to be bothered. She broke federal laws and the U.S Attorney General’s office does not want to be bothered with it as it is not egregious enough(???). Why do we have laws if they don’t apply to all people? She used her daughter’s identity for years and it is not egregious enough? Similar crime, but HE was prosecuted by Sioux Falls office. Wagner was told that Amy Lyngstad would not go to prison because the system did not like him. Laws are not relevant just what the system wants covered up.
Can you say COVERUP!!!!!? We don’t like you so we will ignore the rule of laws and cover up bad Judges in South Dakota.
Email to Congress.
I spoke with Dennis Holmes of the Sioux Falls U.S Attorney General’s office. My ex-wife using our daughter’s identity after her conviction is not egregious enough for them to prosecute. Amy Lyngstad used a fake social security number to get a credit card using the kid’s identity. It is not serious enough? Google southdakotagov and listen to the phone call between him and I.
Sounds like does not want to be bothered about such trivial matters and identity theft.He does not like me and does not want to be bothered about federal crimes. He makes the law and exceptions?
Don’t call me, email me and it appears I will have to visit your offices. Just what the hell are they covering up that they will not prosecute a series of federal crimes?
The U.S. Attorney Generals office does not enforce the law as written. Or are they covering something up or embarrassed she can do so many federal crimes and not get caught?
On Amy Lyngstad’s hidden Facebook account is a picture of her and her convicted pedophile. Also on the page are pictures of people’s children.
Amy Lyngstad testified she does not have a picture of her and her b/f on her face book account.
On the news there are stories of pedophiles using their girlfriends account to get on Facebook to view and contact children. Or pedophiles force their girlfriend to the girlfriends account to use the internet as the girlfriend has no where else to go. convicted sex offenders are not supposed to be on Facebook but laws hardly apply to Amy Lyngstad. She knows law enforcement and Judges will not bother her with such things as her committing felonies and other crimes. Child protection services is not a children’s protection agency. Amy Lyngstad has arrests and convictions for domestic violence which under law makes for a rebuttal that she should have custody of children. But as shown laws are not relevant in a South Dakota Court if Amy Lyngtad is involved due to the animosity of law enforcement and judges against her ex. All entirely plausible. Linda Kogel committed perjury along with Judge Anderson and nothing is done about it as shown on this site.
Under the “fair use” rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Don’t you think the public has a right to know about a possible danger to children, covered up by the Courts and law enforcement?
Reply from Kristie Noem’s office. Why is Amy Lyngstad not prosecuted by Assistant A.G. Brandon Johnson for identity theft after the investigation by Jim Morningwood. Mr. Morning wood turned in the evidence of identity theft and mis-use of social security numbers to Mr. Johnson’s office. Why is it not on the news like everyone else’s if Lyngstad was arrested for committing federal felonies? In addition why is not Linda Kogel and Judge Jim Anderson prosecuted by the State for perjury when the duo so blatantly commits perjury? Why no answer from Senator Johnson and John Thune? The old boys network protecting their pocketbooks or they are not up for re-election so they don’t have any interest in South Dakota corruption and crimes? Lyngstad has a good income from committing federal crimes but the IRS is not interested why?
Telephone call to Representative Kristi Noem’s aide. Again if someone breaks federal law and you are the victim hire a lawyer to get a prosecution. Bad Judge? Hire an attorney. He too is speechless on the fact Amy Lyngstad does not have to obey laws.
Why is Amy Lyngstad above the law? Why can Linda Kogel and Judge Jim Anderson commit perjury with out consequences?
The Center for Public Integrity released a report detailing the risk of corruption and lack of accountability. South Dakota is the 2nd most corrupt State in the Union.
- Overall grade: (50)
- Public access to information: D+
- Legislative accountability: F
- Political financing: F
- Ethics enforcement agencies: F
The government is not accountable to the people, just like this site shows. On MSN homepage on March 27th was a picture of the State Capitol in Pierre under the caption most corrupt State. Too bad it is not available anymore.