Who protects the child?

The youngest daughter got pregnant at 18 and now has a daughter of her own. High school drop out and pregnant at 18 thanks to a corrupt court system that kept the father out. Lyngstad and her parents brain washed her that her dad wanted nothing to do with her along with “health professionals” professionals such as Heartland. The daughter lied to the court as shown by court documents , Lyngstad was coaching her on the stand. (see last attempt at protection order).

She said her dad could see her and the baby if this site was taken down. When it was hidden she no longer wanted to talk to her dad. Manipulative like her mother.

The daughter will lie to you to get her way then go back on her word. Following in her mother’s footsteps, since that is the life she knows.

The new mother said that Dale Kotalik is a real nice person. Famous last words about child molesters after they molested children. He was a real nice person, we did not think he was molesting children, he was such a nice man. In 1995 when he convicted Lyngstad thought that was horrible him molesting children, now she lives with him. The grandfather can not see the child but a registered sex offender can. Or how long before her mother moves in, with tax payers footing the bills?

Picture of him. Kotalik

YOUR SILENCE WILL NOT HELP THE NEXT VICTIM. Tell a Friend.

Amy Lyngstad
Phone Number: 6056652216 old phone number for you bill collectors.
Utica,SD 57078

The youngest did not remember this at all, the Court never allowed the father to see the report about the child abuse. The news is full of stories how bad the system is Social Services covering up child abuse. Remember they never allowed anyone to see the report.

court order

Advertisements

Amy Lyngstad bored comment.

lyngstad

 

followurheart1999@yahoo.com

174.32.104.157 Direct TV Utica South Dakota address a.k.a. Amy Lyngstad Utica SD

Submitted on 2015/03/03 at 3:20 pm

Ur kids hate u and never want u in there lives! Why continue to obsess about ur x wife, pretty sure she has moved on…why r u not remarried with another family? Cant fine a woman to put up with the way u attack ur x wife? I actually feel sorry for someone like u. God be with u.

Amy Lyngstad with the help of a corrupt judicial system did everything to destroy the father /daughter relationship. Amy Lyngstad committed dozens of State and Federal crimes yet was only prosecuted once for identity theft even used her own daughter’s identity to commit identity theft while Lyngstad was on probation.

Cant fine a woman? Drunk or high again?  Pretty sure she has moved on? Lyngstad  is unemployable at a regular job with her disorders.  Cleaning service is making your ass big. You got a chauffeur license and insurance driving elderly ladies to stores?

“why r u not remarried with another family?” How do you know he is not and does not have other kids? Stalking him are you? Lyngstad seems to know everything about her ex-husband.

God be with you? You need  help though you know how to manipulate those that could help you.

Lyngstad destroyed the relation ship between the daughters and father so she could get away with her many many crimes. 3 arrests for assault, 2 convictions. Felony convictions for passing no account checks and identity theft and DUI’s.

Anthony at EMS would like to speak with you though you will not answer his calls.  Call him or he says he is getting a court order. 605-301-4876

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), released by the AmericanPsychiatric Association in 2013, lists both sociopathy and psychopathy under the heading of Antisocial Personality Disorders (ASPD).

  • A disregard for laws and social mores
  • A disregard for the rights of others
  • A failure to feel remorse or guilt
  • A tendency to display violent behavior

In addition to their commonalities, sociopaths and psychopaths also have their own unique behavioral characteristics, as well.

Gone Girl

Ignore the law SD law enforcement *read comment*

SD Attorney General tells law enforcement in SD to ignore the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving DUI arrests. U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is required in order to draw blood. SD AG says to ignore the ruling. LINK to keloland. But  Sioux Falls SD requires law enforcement to get a warrant. Link

What kind of Attorney General tells law enforcement to ignore U.S. Supreme Court rulings? A corrupt one who ignores the law at his whim.

You can see why Amy Lyngstad can use her daughter’s identity and use fake social security numbers when Jackley can ignore the law blatantly.

Read comment, Yankton is CORRUPT!

Found on Topix, Yankton:

A person posted a comment about her trip to South Dakota, Her experiences in Yankton she has posted. She has never been to a more corrupt town than Yankton South Dakota. She is right people in South Dakota are in denial that the police and judges in South Dakota are CORRUPT.
southdakotagov she posted her comment and her contact information. Thune and Noem stick their heads in the sand and don’t want to get involved in local corruption. More interested in lining their own pockets.
Ask Amy Lyngstad how to keep from being prosecuted or arrested in South Dakota. Sexual acts?>><<<

Finding of Facts and Conclusions of Law

Finding of facts and conclusion of law finding that Amy Lyngstad is a perjurer, although the Judge does not use that exact phrase. Lyngstad tried to get her daughters to commit perjury. Deputy Sheriff states he can predict the future and the Judge did not believe him. Lyngstad gave lots of perjured testimony and why not she is above the law. Michaela testifies she is scared of her dad but does not know why looking to her mother to see if she said it right. Judge saw it and states it in the findings. Suborning perjury is law but again laws are not enforced in Lyngstad’s case.  Amy Lyngtad’s perjured affidavit link.page 2, page 3. Click on to enlarge.

That Linda Kogel, attorney also perjured herself is not brought up. Lyngstad testified Michaela’s dad is at her work harassing her while Michaela testified he is not. Amy Lyngstad is a bold faced liar, child abusing felon who is above the law thanks to crooked Judges,child protection and law enforcement.   Pages have been corrected to read correctly.

tTPO first page TPO Second page TPO 3rd page 4th page 5th page 6th page 7th page 8th page 9th page 10th page 11 th page 12 page 13th page 14th page 15th 16th 17th page 18th page 19th page 20

Blogger wins! Site protected by First Amendment.

Amy Lyngstad got a Temporary Protection Order  (TPO 12-585) against her ex husband. She testified that he is coming to her house at night. Problem for her was he was working and the Court found her testimony unreliable, legal speak for she is a liar. Lyngstad also put her daughter on the stand and had the daughter perjure herself. The Judge again found the testimony unreliable. The older daughter also testified and her testimony was deemed unreliable. Amy Lyngstad also testified that her ex goes to the daughter’s work and harasses her while her daughter testified he did not. Perjury seems to be Amy Lyngstad’s middle name and why not she knows she will not be prosecuted. The transcript too will be posted.

The best part was that Lyngstad wanted the Court to take the website down. After a thorough findings of facts and conclusions of law this website under the First Amendment of the United States is protected speech.
The findings of facts and conclusion of law will be posted when available. Amy Lyngstad  now commits libel and slander against her  ex husband saying he is stalking her with this website after the ruling. Under law the Judge has no jurisdiction on the matter of her attorney, Linda Kogel, filing perjured documents.



Bottom of page Lyngstad wants this site taken down.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Employer testified that her ex was at work, not in Utica. Her daughter testified her father did not come into her work and harass her as Amy Lyngstad testified too.

 

This site is NOT stalking Amy Lyngstad but the site is showing with a few exceptions that the Courts, Prosecutors and law enforcement don’t follow the law when it comes to Amy Lyngstad. Why is it Amy Lyngstad is not arrested for identity theft and child abuse when the evidence is quite clear she committed both child abuse and identity theft. Or her Attorney Linda Kogel along with her client and 2 daughters also committed perjury?  Amy Lyngstad lied her ass off in Court.Even by a preponderance of the evidence she did not get a protection order, not the reasonable doubt standard. Amy Lyngstad does not want the public to know she is a child abuser, identity thief who social services, law enforcement, and prosecutors cover for. Where is the Amy Lyngstad exclusion?

22-29-1. Perjury–Violation. Any person who, having taken an oath to testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any state or federal proceeding or action in which such an oath may by law be administered, states, intentionally and contrary to the oath, any material matter which the person knows to be false, is guilty of perjury.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-1; SL 2002, ch 113, § 1; SL 2005, ch 120, § 30.

22-29-3. Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.

22-29-6. Subornation of perjury–Violation–Punishment. Any person who intentionally procures another person to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury. Subornation of perjury is punishable in the same manner as perjury, and as if the suborner were personally guilty of the perjury procured.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-3; SL 2005, ch 120, § 35.