Ignore the law SD law enforcement *read comment*

SD Attorney General tells law enforcement in SD to ignore the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving DUI arrests. U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is required in order to draw blood. SD AG says to ignore the ruling. LINK to keloland. But  Sioux Falls SD requires law enforcement to get a warrant. Link

What kind of Attorney General tells law enforcement to ignore U.S. Supreme Court rulings? A corrupt one who ignores the law at his whim.

You can see why Amy Lyngstad can use her daughter’s identity and use fake social security numbers when Jackley can ignore the law blatantly.

Read comment, Yankton is CORRUPT!

Found on Topix, Yankton:

A person posted a comment about her trip to South Dakota, Her experiences in Yankton she has posted. She has never been to a more corrupt town than Yankton South Dakota. She is right people in South Dakota are in denial that the police and judges in South Dakota are CORRUPT.
southdakotagov she posted her comment and her contact information. Thune and Noem stick their heads in the sand and don’t want to get involved in local corruption. More interested in lining their own pockets.
Ask Amy Lyngstad how to keep from being prosecuted or arrested in South Dakota. Sexual acts?>><<<

Advertisements

Blogger wins! Site protected by First Amendment.

Amy Lyngstad got a Temporary Protection Order  (TPO 12-585) against her ex husband. She testified that he is coming to her house at night. Problem for her was he was working and the Court found her testimony unreliable, legal speak for she is a liar. Lyngstad also put her daughter on the stand and had the daughter perjure herself. The Judge again found the testimony unreliable. The older daughter also testified and her testimony was deemed unreliable. Amy Lyngstad also testified that her ex goes to the daughter’s work and harasses her while her daughter testified he did not. Perjury seems to be Amy Lyngstad’s middle name and why not she knows she will not be prosecuted. The transcript too will be posted.

The best part was that Lyngstad wanted the Court to take the website down. After a thorough findings of facts and conclusions of law this website under the First Amendment of the United States is protected speech.
The findings of facts and conclusion of law will be posted when available. Amy Lyngstad  now commits libel and slander against her  ex husband saying he is stalking her with this website after the ruling. Under law the Judge has no jurisdiction on the matter of her attorney, Linda Kogel, filing perjured documents.



Bottom of page Lyngstad wants this site taken down.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Employer testified that her ex was at work, not in Utica. Her daughter testified her father did not come into her work and harass her as Amy Lyngstad testified too.

 

This site is NOT stalking Amy Lyngstad but the site is showing with a few exceptions that the Courts, Prosecutors and law enforcement don’t follow the law when it comes to Amy Lyngstad. Why is it Amy Lyngstad is not arrested for identity theft and child abuse when the evidence is quite clear she committed both child abuse and identity theft. Or her Attorney Linda Kogel along with her client and 2 daughters also committed perjury?  Amy Lyngstad lied her ass off in Court.Even by a preponderance of the evidence she did not get a protection order, not the reasonable doubt standard. Amy Lyngstad does not want the public to know she is a child abuser, identity thief who social services, law enforcement, and prosecutors cover for. Where is the Amy Lyngstad exclusion?

22-29-1. Perjury–Violation. Any person who, having taken an oath to testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any state or federal proceeding or action in which such an oath may by law be administered, states, intentionally and contrary to the oath, any material matter which the person knows to be false, is guilty of perjury.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-1; SL 2002, ch 113, § 1; SL 2005, ch 120, § 30.

22-29-3. Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.

22-29-6. Subornation of perjury–Violation–Punishment. Any person who intentionally procures another person to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury. Subornation of perjury is punishable in the same manner as perjury, and as if the suborner were personally guilty of the perjury procured.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-3; SL 2005, ch 120, § 35.

Rep. Kristie Noem’s Letter, Huh?

Reply from Kristie Noem’s office. Why is Amy Lyngstad not prosecuted by Assistant A.G. Brandon Johnson for identity theft after the investigation by Jim Morningwood. Mr. Morning wood turned in the evidence of identity theft and mis-use of social security numbers to Mr. Johnson’s office. Why is it not on the news like everyone else’s if Lyngstad was arrested for committing federal felonies? In addition why is not Linda Kogel and Judge Jim Anderson prosecuted by the State for perjury when the duo so blatantly commits perjury? Why no answer from Senator Johnson and John Thune? The old boys network protecting their pocketbooks or they are not up for re-election so they don’t have any interest in South Dakota corruption and crimes? Lyngstad has a good income from committing federal crimes but the IRS is not interested why?

Reply to Legislators Emails, IMPEACH Chief Justice Gilbertson!!

 Now Nick Moser will not run again and Bernie Hunhoff is undecided. Link Moser did not pick up petition till March 7th. You entered: 70111570000025637638  Your Item’s Status Your item was delivered at 3:24 pm on March 07, 2012 in YANKTON, SD 57078. Posted on another site.

Impeach Chief Justice David Gilbertson. Linda Kogel committed perjury and Judge Anderson went right along with it. Petition for impeachment below.  Argus Leader article on Amendment E with Mike Wagner link. Justice Gibelbertson is not following the law and this is pure retaliation on his part in violation of the law and civil rights. Read his Order below how he is protecting the Court and legal process or more correctly how the courts cover up corruption by Judges. Chief Justice Gilbertson is the biggest abuser of the legal process. Notice no one would sign for delivery, just stamped with date received.

Well who does know why the Judges are acting this way? The South Dakota Bar and Judicial Qualifications Commission do not want to deal with it or hear about it. Amendment E could have dealt with this issue.

The Governor will not enforce the laws even thought the SD Constitution says so:§ 3. Powers and duties of the Governor. The Governor shall be responsible for the faithful execution of the law. He may, by appropriate action or proceeding brought in the name of the state, enforce compliance with any constitutional or legislative mandate, or restrain violation of any constitutional or legislative power, duty or right by any officer, department or agency of the state or any of its civil divisions.

Chief Justice Gilbertson on how he wants to protect the Judiciary. He means how to protect his fiefdom and cover up the corruption in the SD Courts. The Judges ignore filed evidence and allow perjury by an attorney and a Judge.

He sends Motions right back and does not comment on the perjury committed in Court or how the Court is ignoring evidence. Not to mention the child abuse and felonies Amy Lyngstad has committed unfettered.

Linda Kogel, Attorney at Law, Perjurer

Linda Kogel in her Motion, second paragraph states ” Defendant has at all times refused to engage in or successfully complete a parenting class.” Filed September of 2000 a completion of parenting classes taken  a year earlier certificate. Kogel keeps telling the Court the Defendant never took parenting classes. How many lies can an attorney tell the Court?  South Dakota Courts Plenty. Her email below makes it about him not her lying to the court for years. She also states that the daugther’s social security numbers are posted but she can not produce the webpage. They never were posted but can lie all she wants.

Linda Kogel signed it and testified that it was true. She will make excuses and forget the law. What about the social security numbers she says are posted which never were? Gilbertson does know, return receipt shown below.Even if Kogel was arrested for perjury the Judge would dismiss it. All the felonies Lyngstad did and no prosecution proves the courts are corrupt. Prosecution or Judge or both corrupt?

She forgot about the certificate filed years ago, not an excuse under law for committing perjury.  SDCL for perjury

 Congress.org

Answer from SD Attorney Generals Office.

Answer from SD Attorney Generals office. A person breaks a law against you hire an attorney. Can you say cronyism? Tom Kellar broke the law and the mp3 of the hearing where he states he knows the law and that he is to back date it to November 2nd. Why do we have laws any way when only honest people have to follow them?  The answer makes no sense. Someone breaks a law against you hire an Attorney? Someone breaks the law file an appeal? WTF? That explains why Amy Lyngstad is not prosecuted for passing no account checks and identity theft. You have to hire an attorney to prosecute her. As a taxpayer you evidently are not entitled to protection from law breakers by the SD Attorney General’s office.