Finding of Facts and Conclusions of Law


Finding of facts and conclusion of law finding that Amy Lyngstad is a perjurer, although the Judge does not use that exact phrase. Lyngstad tried to get her daughters to commit perjury. Deputy Sheriff states he can predict the future and the Judge did not believe him. Lyngstad gave lots of perjured testimony and why not she is above the law. Michaela testifies she is scared of her dad but does not know why looking to her mother to see if she said it right. Judge saw it and states it in the findings. Suborning perjury is law but again laws are not enforced in Lyngstad’s case.  Amy Lyngtad’s perjured affidavit link.page 2, page 3. Click on to enlarge.

That Linda Kogel, attorney also perjured herself is not brought up. Lyngstad testified Michaela’s dad is at her work harassing her while Michaela testified he is not. Amy Lyngstad is a bold faced liar, child abusing felon who is above the law thanks to crooked Judges,child protection and law enforcement.   Pages have been corrected to read correctly.

tTPO first page TPO Second page TPO 3rd page 4th page 5th page 6th page 7th page 8th page 9th page 10th page 11 th page 12 page 13th page 14th page 15th 16th 17th page 18th page 19th page 20

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s