Blogger wins! Site protected by First Amendment.


Amy Lyngstad got a Temporary Protection Order  (TPO 12-585) against her ex husband. She testified that he is coming to her house at night. Problem for her was he was working and the Court found her testimony unreliable, legal speak for she is a liar. Lyngstad also put her daughter on the stand and had the daughter perjure herself. The Judge again found the testimony unreliable. The older daughter also testified and her testimony was deemed unreliable. Amy Lyngstad also testified that her ex goes to the daughter’s work and harasses her while her daughter testified he did not. Perjury seems to be Amy Lyngstad’s middle name and why not she knows she will not be prosecuted. The transcript too will be posted.

The best part was that Lyngstad wanted the Court to take the website down. After a thorough findings of facts and conclusions of law this website under the First Amendment of the United States is protected speech.
The findings of facts and conclusion of law will be posted when available. Amy Lyngstad  now commits libel and slander against her  ex husband saying he is stalking her with this website after the ruling. Under law the Judge has no jurisdiction on the matter of her attorney, Linda Kogel, filing perjured documents.



Bottom of page Lyngstad wants this site taken down.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Employer testified that her ex was at work, not in Utica. Her daughter testified her father did not come into her work and harass her as Amy Lyngstad testified too.

 

This site is NOT stalking Amy Lyngstad but the site is showing with a few exceptions that the Courts, Prosecutors and law enforcement don’t follow the law when it comes to Amy Lyngstad. Why is it Amy Lyngstad is not arrested for identity theft and child abuse when the evidence is quite clear she committed both child abuse and identity theft. Or her Attorney Linda Kogel along with her client and 2 daughters also committed perjury?  Amy Lyngstad lied her ass off in Court.Even by a preponderance of the evidence she did not get a protection order, not the reasonable doubt standard. Amy Lyngstad does not want the public to know she is a child abuser, identity thief who social services, law enforcement, and prosecutors cover for. Where is the Amy Lyngstad exclusion?

22-29-1. Perjury–Violation. Any person who, having taken an oath to testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any state or federal proceeding or action in which such an oath may by law be administered, states, intentionally and contrary to the oath, any material matter which the person knows to be false, is guilty of perjury.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-1; SL 2002, ch 113, § 1; SL 2005, ch 120, § 30.

22-29-3. Incompetence of witness no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that the accused actually was required to give such testimony or made such deposition or certificate.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1242; SL 2005, ch 120, § 32.

22-29-6. Subornation of perjury–Violation–Punishment. Any person who intentionally procures another person to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury. Subornation of perjury is punishable in the same manner as perjury, and as if the suborner were personally guilty of the perjury procured.

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.1237; SL 1976, ch 158, § 29-3; SL 2005, ch 120, § 35.

Advertisements

One thought on “Blogger wins! Site protected by First Amendment.

  1. Thank you for excercising your freedom of speech. I keep going back to this website and http://www.publicintegrity.org because my understanding of corruption has completely changed after my trip to South Dakota in April.
    I was having a discussion with someone on corruption. They were saying how places like New Jersey, New York City and Chicago are the most corrupt places. They used examples of politicians and police getting convicted and going to jail for crimes. I told them that the reason places like that have their officials tried is because they are actually LESS corrupt. Places that don’t check and hold people in power accountable are much more corrupt. These are places that, on paper, seem straight. In reality, they are the most corrupt places in the country. Not surprising that the most corrupt states on this list are some of the states that I have personally labeled “police states” from my experiences traveling the country alone.

    http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/03/19/8423/grading-nation-how-accountable-your-state

    (South Carolina, Georgia, South Dakota, North Dakota, —HIGH on the list. A state is very corrupt if I drive at night and see more police cars on the road than I do regular cars, and I need to get randomly searched. How would they get that kind of funding?).

    Of course, I prefer cities to smaller towns and realize I am bias in that respect, but just posting the flip side. My point is that just because a state has a lot of government and police in jail or tried for crimes, does not mean they are more corrupt. It shows that those places actually have an American Value system of checks and balances. Checks and Balances of every form are a good thing, and places that don’t have them will still have their officials commit crimes and abuse power, the only difference is that they will get away with it and cover it up. With that respect, it is actually worse.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s