Southdakotagov's Weblog

Phone call to Senator John Thune’s office

southdakotagov — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:35:39 +0000

Telephone call to Senator Thune’s office. Why are federal laws passed that no one enforces? Evidently Senator Thune does not care about South Dakotans or just certain South Dakotans? Other Congressman ask for investigation into South Dakota though.

LINK to Thune’s Staffer phone call. Opens in new window and just click play at center of the screen.

Congressman call for investigation into South Dakota Social Services. LINK

She talks of separation of State and Federal jurisdiction over the Judiciary. The two (STATE) judges, Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. and Michael T. Conahan, pleaded guilty in Federal District Court in Scranton, Pa. Link 2 State Judges were violating children’s rights.

We send troops over seas to stop this kind of thing but Senator Thune can NOT help South Dakotans. The Sioux Falls office most likely does not want to upset the apple cart with all the corruption going on here. Better to keep the public in the dark how things really work.

Forwarded from Congress.org LINK

New referal

southdakotagov — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:12:53 +0000

Someone else looking for Amy Lyngstad. LINK Notice the language is different from a collection agency.

Michaela’s Picture

southdakotagov — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:17:51 +0000

Picture that has a negative shows a black eye and swollen cheek where hit by a ruler on the face by Amy Lyngstad. Child Protection lied about it saying it was digital and did not want to see the negative.

South Dakota Child Protection covers up child abuse as they are above the law and are accountable to no one. One can see why the State keeps the father in the dark as the children would tell the truth. Public should never the truth.

Can you trust law enforcement? Deputy with child porn having sex with the 16 year old babysitter. KELO

Child Protection has done 3 investigations but will not release to the Court finding after the first. Even if the Court issues a sub peona they will resist turning over their findings. Note address on the letter.

No Freedom of Speech for you! Linda Kogel, Attorney at Law.

southdakotagov — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:44:34 +0000

A portion of Linda Kogel’s Motion regarding custody of Michaela Wagner. Kogel signed the Motion to Censor his right to Free Speech, which is illegal.

Lee D. Anderson’s letter directing a Home Study and visitation. One would think the requirements would have been met since to Ordered visitation and Home Study.Kogel can file perjured documents without accountability. Exhibit 5 is this website. Judge Arthur Rusch did issue protective Orders ordering this site taken down but was unable to enforce them. The Court does not want the public to know that the Judges in South Dakota do not follow the laws as written. Wagner never said that but Linda Kogel does not have to fear perjury charges. Such as the children’s social securtiy numbers are posted. Never ever were they posted but she can lie her ass off and gets away with it. Read the Federal Opinion just released how the Framers of the Constitution felt about freedom of speech. The SD Courts do not feel the same way. Really Linda who is May Lyngstad? Don’t you proofread? Kogel has no proof of the site owner as required by law to even make this absrud attempt.

The last sentence is particularly bothersome as it directly defies the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Note the date it was signed, 3 days before the hearing. 15-6-6(d). Time for motion–Affidavits–Briefs. A written motion, opposing affidavits or briefs may be served not later than five days before the hearing, unless the court permits them to be served at some other time. A reply brief or affidavit may be served by the movant not later than two days before the hearing, unless the court permits them to be served at some other time. Judge Jim W. Anderson could care less about the law.

In his 27-page order, Judge Roger W. Titus wrote that “while Mr. Cassidy’s speech may have inflicted substantial emotional distress, the government’s indictment here is directed squarely at protected speech: anonymous, uncomfortable Internet speech addressing religious matters.” Page 10 onward talks directly how this site is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution which Linda Kogel spits on. Congress.org letter to leaders.

Addressed here is just how corrupt the State of South Dakota government is, with Judges having free rein to trample people’s rights.

III. The Broad Protections Of The First Amendment
Under the First Amendment “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of
speech.” U.S. Const. amend. I. From our nation’s founding, there has been a tradition of protecting
anonymous speech, particularly anonymous political or religious speech. See Watchtower Bible &
Tract Society v. Village of Stratton, 536 U.S. 150, 162 (2002); Lefkoe v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.,
577 F.3d 240, 248 (4th Cir. 2009) (“Courts have typically protected anonymity under the First
Amendment when claimed in connection with literary, religious, or political speech.”) For example,
the Federalist Papers, written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, but published
under the pseudonym “Publius,” are in and of themselves the best example of anonymous political
speech. See McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S. 334, 343 n.6 (1995). And the opponents
of the federalists, the anti-federalists, also used pseudonyms to publish their views anonymously.

True we are not in the same leauge as the Framers of the Constitution but they believed that the people should have a voice while the South Dakota Court does not.

As found on the internet on a people search site. James W. Anderson age 66 1819 Flag Mountain Dr Pierre, SD (605) 224-9683

Linda Kogel age 64 405 S University StVermillion, SD (605) 624-5210

sd.gov South Dakota, South Dakota Government, Pierre

Domestic Violence and Social Services HIDES it.

southdakotagov — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:07:12 +0000

Testimony by Dale Kotalik’s probation officer as far as he can recall,Kotalik molested more than one child. What was not brought up was Dale Kotalik’s domestic violence conviction. A $1000 bond,sounds serious. He and Amy Lyngstad make a great pair of felons sharing the same interests and not paying their bill. Having judgment’s against them while abusing children and committing domestic violence.
Lyngstad has 3 arrests and 2 convictions for domestic violence. Click on picture to enlarge. Letters from Social Services. There were 3 investigation at the trailer in Utica but Social Services will only acknowledge one. They will not let the father view the reports,even though legally they are too. The reason Daniel Todd states is not a valid legal reason. First he has no proof who put what where on the internet and that old pesky First Amendment. See below. Child Protection denys the charges asserted in the lawsuit against them by the ACLU. Note it was only sent to Lyngstad. Child Protection need to operate in secrecy like the Gestapo.

Congress.org

Hoarders and Intervention

southdakotagov — Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:08:44 +0000

In my opinion judging from her latest FaceBook page a candidate for the tv shows Intervention and Hoarders. Look at the background and all the weight loss from previous pictures.

Truancy 43 absences no prosecution.

southdakotagov — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:32:48 +0000

Daughter has 43 absences. Yankton school policy is no more that 15 absences before notifying States Attorney to prosecute for truancy. Again the law don’t apply to Amy Lyngstad. Referral to Social Services another big joke.

Almost 3 times the allowed absences. Under law they would have to visit Lyngstad at her residence. Under law Lyngstad should have been prosecuted as the law shows below. If they would actually jail her then Michaela would be alone with a child molester.

Attendance detail report for Wagner, Michaela Marie for classes belonging to the Q2 term:

DAILY PERIOD BREAKDOWN

Expression P1(RG) P1(HR) P1(SRP):

- 8/30/2011 A, – 10/6/2011 L, – 10/7/2011 A, P1(HR) – 11/4/2011 A, P1(RG) – 12/21/2011 A Expression P2(RG) P2(HR) P2(SRP)- 8/30/2011 A, – 10/6/2011 A, – 10/7/2011 A, P2(HR) – 11/4/2011 A, P2(RG) – 12/21/2011 A Expression P3(RG) P3(HR) P3(SRP): – 8/30/2011 A, – 10/6/2011 A, – 10/7/2011 A, P3(HR) – 11/4/2011 A, P3(HR) – 12/14/2011 X, P3(RG) – 12/21/2011 A Expression P4(RG) P4(HR) P4(SRP):- 8/30/2011 A, – 10/6/2011 A, – 10/7/2011 A, P4(SRP) – 10/26/2011 L, P4(HR) – 11/4/2011 A, P4(HR) – 12/14/2011 L, P4(RG) – 12/21/2011 A Expression P5(RG) P5(HR) P5(SRP)- 8/30/2011 A, – 10/6/2011 A, – 10/7/2011 A, P5(SRP) – 10/26/2011 A, P5(HR) – 11/4/2011 A, P5(HR) – 12/14/2011 A, P5(RG) – 12/21/2011 A Expression P6(RG) P6(HR) P6(SRP)- 8/30/2011 A, – 9/12/2011 L, – 10/6/2011 A, – 10/7/2011 A, P6(SRP) – 10/26/2011 A, P6(HR) – 11/4/2011 A, P6(RG) – 12/6/2011 X, P6(HR) – 12/14/2011 A, P6(RG) – 12/21/2011 A Expression P7(RG) P7(HR) P7(SRP): – 8/30/2011 A, – 9/12/2011 A, – 10/6/2011 A, – 10/7/2011 A, – 10/10/2011 L, P7(SRP) – 10/26/2011 A, P7(HR) – 11/4/2011 A, P7(HR) – 11/14/2011 L, P7(HR) – 12/14/2011 A, P7(RG) – 12/21/2011 A Expression HR(RG) HR(HR) HR(SRP):- 10/7/2011 A, HR(HR) – 11/4/2011 A

(Code Legend: =Present, U=Absent Unexcused, X=Tardy Unexcused, A=Absent Excused, T=Tardy Excused, L=Leave Early, S=School Activity, B=In Building-CL, I=In School Suspension, O=Out of School Suspension, N=Not Enrolled)

TOTALS

43 Absences

2 Tardies

ATTENDANCE POLICY FOR YANKTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS

C. LEVEL 2

1. This procedure will be activated after 15 absences during the school year.

LEVEL 2 Yankton Attendance policy
1. This procedure will be activated after 15 absences during the school year.
2. The administration office of the child’s attendance center will review the student’s
absences. The administrator in charge will attempt to telephone a parent or guardian
regarding the absences.
3. A letter will also be sent to the parent or guardian regarding the continued
absenteeism.
4. A referral will be made to the State’s Attorney, who may, in his or her discretion,
pursue juvenile proceedings to declare the student a Child in Need of Supervision
pursuant to SDCL Ch. 26-8B or criminal proceedings against the student’s parent or
guardian pursuant to SDCL Ch. 13-27. Additional action will be considered to
determine the health and well-being of the student, including but not limited to, a
referral to the Department of Social Services.
5. School Administrators, with law enforcement, may visit the student’s living quarters
to encourage attendance.

Answer from SD Attorney Generals Office.

southdakotagov — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 01:17:01 +0000

Answer from SD Attorney Generals office. A person breaks a law against you hire an attorney. Can you say cronyism? Tom Kellar broke the law and the mp3 of the hearing where he states he knows the law and that he is to back date it to November 2nd. Why do we have laws any way when only honest people have to follow them? The answer makes no sense. Someone breaks a law against you hire an Attorney? Someone breaks the law file an appeal? WTF? That explains why Amy Lyngstad is not prosecuted for passing no account checks and identity theft. You have to hire an attorney to prosecute her. As a taxpayer you evidently are not entitled to protection from law breakers by the SD Attorney General’s office.

Bill collector for check fraud

southdakotagov — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:06:42 +0000

Bill collector phone call for Amy Lyngstad for check fraud. Again.They are going to take legal action against her. Getting a judgment against Lyngstad is a waste of time as she has a number of judgments against her all ready. She ‘cleans’ peoples houses so they can not garnish her wages.

Link to copy of CALL.

The bill collector that wishes her luck at the end of the call. They are the ones going to need luck with collection of any money from the deadbeat. Turn the checks over for prosecution by the Yankton’s States Attorney is worthless due to the corruption in South Dakota. Such as her using her daughter’s identity and nothing was done. Nor the 1000s of no account checks she has written.

Good to be a felon in South Dakota committing check fraud.

Child support modification hearing

southdakotagov — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:41:03 +0000

Child support modification hearing held before Tom Keller. She claims she does not use have other names. He states what he has. It shows she goes by other names. Tom Keller has the sheriff’s report as he states. On his website he explains the laws about custody. Her living with a pedophile with a minor child is endangering the child yet the law and courts DO NOT CARE!!! Bill collector for medical bills for Lyngstad. link

Note:
She lies about using other names. She has a federal identity theft conviction, she used his identity so he wants to give her his financial information so she has the ability to steal his identity again.
He has to pay for insurance for the children while the State picks up her share.
Towards the end she does not deny living with a child molester.

Link to MP3 of hearing here Opens in new window. About 20 minutes long.