Federal Trade Commission
Posted: November 20, 2009 Filed under: Civil Rights, cover ujp, Fraud, FBI, Government, grades, Identity theft, John Thune, Judicial Qualifications Commission, Office of Victims Rights, Senator John Thune, Social Services, South Dakota, South Dakota,, Tim Johnson, Uncategorized, Yankton, Yankton School Distirct | Tags: Argus Leader, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, Identity theft, Inspector General, Judge Anderson, Linda Kogel, Press and Dakotan, South Dakota, Yankton 1 Comment »A page from the Federal Trade Commission on Amy Lyngstad using her daughter’s identity. When called they are confused too why Amy Lyngstad has not been arrested for identity theft.
The trial court has a duty to ensure the children are protected at every turn. Williams v. Williams, 425 N.W.2d 390, 393 (S.D. 1988); Jasper v. Jasper, 351 N.W.2d 114, 117 (S.D. 1984).
Just another case law Judge Anderson and the rest of his brethren ignore. Laws are only to scare honest people.
106 bad checks no prosecution.
Lists different Social Security numbers and alias, FTC has as well as law enforcement and the Courts. No prosecution.
[...] To recap recent events, Amy Lyngstad , my ex wife last December applied on line to First Premier Bank in Sioux Falls for a credit card using fraudulent information. This in itself is a series of federal crimes. She used our daughter’s name, someone else’s social security number, fake birth date and real employer. Lyngstad got a credit card fraudulently and maxed it out. There was a credit block on our daughter’s credit but Lyngstad got around that. First Premier Bank was notified that account was opened fraudulently and instead of a prosecution wrote it off. The public does not need to bail out banks that condone crimes but we do it appears, but I digress. The relevant documents that this took place are enclosed. Last year the Yankton Sheriff’s office ‘investigated’ the fact our daughter had a judgment against her, filed when she was 12 years old. The Sheriff’s office served my ex since they could not serve our daughter. Enclosed is the letter from the Yankton business about why was Lyngstad not arrested when she was served since obviously she used our daughter’s identity? Enclosed is a copy of the Sheriff’s report. [...]